Proposal for evaluation of CLIL and IPA methodologies in learning connectors in a second language
Proposal for evaluation of CLIL and IPA methodologies in learning connectors in a second language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36799/el.v6i1.108Keywords:
discursive connectors, bilingual teaching, assessment, rubricsAbstract
One of the didactic elements that best shows how well students master a foreign language is their mastery of the discursive connectors. This article offers an evaluation proposal of the effectiveness of the CLIL model and the IPA (Integrated Plurilingual Approach) approach in terms of teaching/learning of these connectors. Thus, the results obtained in the praxis of the classroom of two groups of students will be analysed and evaluated after putting into practice two didactic sequences using both methodologies. The data provided by the evaluation by rubric seem to suggest that the details of the linguistic practice of the connectors are more easily appropriated by the learners with the IPA approach than with the CLIL model.
Downloads
References
Andrade, Heidi. “Using Rubrics to promote thinking and learning in Education”. Educational Leadership, 57.5 (2000): 13-18.
Berenguer Martín, Jorge. IX Liceum Ogólnokształcące, Polonia. “La Casa de Bernarda Alba. Unidad AICLE”. [Power Point Slider]. Asignatura de literatura española, sección bilingüe en español, en Polonia. 4 de diciembre de 2013 https://es.slideshare.net/jorgeberenguermartin/la-casa-de-bernarda-alba-unidad-aicle
Bludau, M. “Zur Stand des bilingualen Unterrichts in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland”. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen, 4 (1996): 208-215.
Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning Teaching, Assessment, Strasbourg: Language policy Unit, 2001.
Coyle, Do. “Supporting students in content and language integrated context: planning for effective classroom”. En Masih, J. (Ed.). Learning through a foreign language: models, methods and outcomes. London: Center for Information on Language Teaching and Research (1999): 46-62.
Coyle, Do. “Content and Language Integrated Learning. Motivating Learners and Teachers”. 2006. <http://blocs.xtec.cat/clilpractiques1/files/2008/11/sircoyle.pdf>
Cummins, Jim. “Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms”. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10.2 (2007): 221-240.
Engeström, Yrjö “From Design Experiments to Formative Interventions”. Theory and Psychology, 21.5 (2011): 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252
Esteve, Olga. “La interacción en el aula desde el punto de vista de la construcción de conocimientos: un planteamiento didáctico”. En Salaberri, S. (Ed.). La lengua, vehículo cultural multidisciplinar. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, 2002.
Esteve, Olga, Ernesto Martín y Encarna Atienza. “The Integrated Plurilingual Approach: A didactic model providing guidance to Spanish schools for reconceptualizing the teaching of additional languages”. Sociocultural Theory, 4.1 (2017): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.32868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.32868
Eurydice. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: European Unit, 2006.
Fuentes, Catalina. “La gramática discursiva; niveles, unidades y planos de análisis”, Cuadernos AISPI, 2 (2013): 15-33.
Galperin, Piotr. “Stage by stage as a method of psychological investigation”. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30.4 (1992): 69-80. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460
Garrido, María del Camino. “Los conectores pragmáticos en la enseñanza de ELE: argumentación y relevancia”. En Actas del X Congreso Internacional de ASELE. Cádiz: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz, (2000): 323-330.
Gatica, Florina y Teresita del Niño Jesús Uribarren. “¿Cómo elaborar una rúbrica?”, Investigación en Educación Médica, 2.5 (2013): 61-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72684-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72684-X
Graddol, David. (2006). English next. London: British Council, 2006.
Hablacultura. “Canciones para aprender español <20 de abril>”. Hablacultura. Recursos para estudiantes y profesores de español. 20 de abril de 2018. https://hablacultura.com/20-de-abril/#comments
Halliday, Michael Alexander. Language and Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
Krashen, Stephen. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.
Krashen, Stephen. The Input hypothesis: issues and implications, New York: Longman, 1985.
Longolia. “Los conectores discursivos”. Longolia. Supérate con los idiomas. 2020. https://espanol.lingolia.com/es/vocabulario/conectores-discursivos
Llinares, Ana.; Tom Morton y Rachel Whittaker. The Role of Languages in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Mallol, Cristina y Miquel Alsina. “Enfoque plurilingüe integrado: una experiencia educativa interdisciplinar en el tratamiento integrado de las lenguas en la ESO”. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 12 (2017): 45.53 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.6547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.6547
Marsh, David. CLIL/EMILE, The European dimensions: actions, trends, and foresight potential. Brussel: European Commision, 2002.
Martí, Manuel y Sara Fernández. Los marcadores discursivos. Edinumen: Madrid, 2013.
Martín Ernesto. “Un modelo de enfoque plurilingüe en la enseñanza de la lengua en la escuela”, Minguaran Arena, 5 (2014): 47-66.
Mehisto, Peeter; David Marsh y María Jesús Frigols. Uncovering CLIL, Content and Language Integrated learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan, 2008.
Meléndez, Carlos. (2007). “Esp. afortunadamente, desgraciadamente / fr. heureusement, malheureusement: esbozo contrastivo de dos pares de partículas modales”, en Interlingüística, 17 (2007): 737-747.
Moate, Josephine. “Reconceptualising the role of talk in CLIL”, Journal of Applied LanguageStudies, 5.2 (2011): 17-35.
Monereo, Carles. “La evaluación del conocimiento estratégico a través de tareas auténticas”, Revista de Pensamiento Educativo, 32 (2003): 71-89.
Negueruela, Eduardo. “Beliefs as conceptualizing activity: A dialectical approach for the second language classroom”. System, 39 (2011): 359-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.008
Piccardo, Enrica. From communicative to Action-Oriented: a Research Pathway. Ontario: Ministry of Education, 2014
Torres, Analí. (2009). “La educación para el empoderamiento y sus desafíos”. Sapiens. Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 10.1 (2009): 89-108.
Van Lier, Leo. “Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity”. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1.1 (2007): 46-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/illt42.0
Vigotsky, Lev. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Juan Antonio Martínez,Víctor Cantero García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
El autor o autores conservan en todo momento sus derechos morales y patrimoniales sobre la obra; la obra no se puede alterar, transformar o ampliar; siempre debe reconocerse la autoría del documento referido. Ninguna de las modalidades de los documentos publicados en Estudios λambda. Teoría y práctica de la didáctica en lengua y literatura tienen fines comerciales de naturaleza alguna.
